Categories
Home
 
 
   
Collection Agency reporting false debt

Question:
Collection Agency reporting false debt Two collections agencies are reporting collection activity against me for 2 different debts, neither of which is mine. I sent both agencies a certified letter stating that the debt was not mine, that I had never heard of them and was not their customer, etc., and insisting they remove it. Both of them responded merely by mailing me a "statement" with my name and a former address on it. No explanation whatsoever. What should I do next? Send another insistant letter and demand they stop reporting this false debt? Do I need to think about a lawsuit? Small claims or with an attorney? Any letter writing techniques I can try to stay out of court if necessary. The debts are both small ($60 and $100) and I have half a mind to just pay the debts with a conditional endorsement to remove the report. Or maybe offer them half as an offer to settle? Has anybody else had any success in this kind of situation?


Answer:
I am not an attorney and this is not legal advise but is based on my own experience. First try writing a well-worded letter to your state attorney general explaining the situation very clearly and with as much proof as you can that the debts are not yours and advise them that you have sent cert. notice of that to the agencies. Send a copy to the collection agencies. Also get a copy of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (it must be on-line somewhere)and find out exactly what the parameters are for the agencies' conduct and what your legal rights and responsibilities are. If you feel the agencies are violating the Act, tell them, citing the relevent part. Your first line of defense in any valid complaint is awareness of the law and communicating that to the agency. If that doesn't shake them, and the atty. general's inquiry doesn't shake them, then you'll have to pay
(contingent on the neg. info being removed from the credit report). This MAY be done via restrictive endorsement depending on your state's law. If this were a large sum of money atty. involvement would be wise. I can't imagine they would dig their heels in too far for $100/60. But then again, it wouldn't surprise me if they did.



Submit your comment or answer


 

Privacy Policy